Re: Calderwood exit confirmed
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:45 am
[quote="Mike]
What is your reasoning that says we won't have any additions in 2009?[/quote]
I am not saying we won't have any additions but if we do get anyone it may well be another bargain basement swoop IMO.
We aren't losing that many players. Higham, Calderwood and TB are the only ones on significant dosh that are leaving.
Everyone else has been re-signed such as Lockers.
We have also given mew deals to McIllorum, Prescott, Goulding and several other young players that must be an enhancement in terms of pay that will eat more into next years cap more than they earn this year.
So I think that we are almost certainly giving pay rises to several players and this has not been spotted.
As I said IL has written in his program notes 2009 he expected one or two signings for next season. One I think was Riddle. Lets say that's Higham's wage gone.
So how's Calderwood's wage going to be spent? On Phelps and the pay rises I mentioned above? I think if we manage to squeeze a few pay rises and Phelps out of his wage we will do well.
So that leaves TB's wage. We have Smith who will probably be cheap (but not free). So that leaves us with the possibility of another experienced player maybe which ties in with IL's "one or two" players assuming he meant experienced good quality players.
Whether dividing up TB's wage we could get more players may be true but would that make us a better side? I am not convinced.
But assuming I am wrong who do you think will make way for the new signing(s)? If O'Carroll gets a deal I can't see us signing a prop. We have Carmont, Goulding and Phelps as centres. Pryce, Richards & Colbon on the wings. TL and TS as half backs and plenty of back row forwards and all these players are contracted for next season.
I'd be happy with one more player of note but I think anyone who is expecting more recruits than that will be disappointed.
Dave
What is your reasoning that says we won't have any additions in 2009?[/quote]
I am not saying we won't have any additions but if we do get anyone it may well be another bargain basement swoop IMO.
We aren't losing that many players. Higham, Calderwood and TB are the only ones on significant dosh that are leaving.
Everyone else has been re-signed such as Lockers.
We have also given mew deals to McIllorum, Prescott, Goulding and several other young players that must be an enhancement in terms of pay that will eat more into next years cap more than they earn this year.
So I think that we are almost certainly giving pay rises to several players and this has not been spotted.
As I said IL has written in his program notes 2009 he expected one or two signings for next season. One I think was Riddle. Lets say that's Higham's wage gone.
So how's Calderwood's wage going to be spent? On Phelps and the pay rises I mentioned above? I think if we manage to squeeze a few pay rises and Phelps out of his wage we will do well.
So that leaves TB's wage. We have Smith who will probably be cheap (but not free). So that leaves us with the possibility of another experienced player maybe which ties in with IL's "one or two" players assuming he meant experienced good quality players.
Whether dividing up TB's wage we could get more players may be true but would that make us a better side? I am not convinced.
But assuming I am wrong who do you think will make way for the new signing(s)? If O'Carroll gets a deal I can't see us signing a prop. We have Carmont, Goulding and Phelps as centres. Pryce, Richards & Colbon on the wings. TL and TS as half backs and plenty of back row forwards and all these players are contracted for next season.
I'd be happy with one more player of note but I think anyone who is expecting more recruits than that will be disappointed.
Dave