Quoting the relevant parts of a post you want to reply to isn't dissecting it if that is what you meant. It makes the reply easier to read and Geoff will tell you its how you are expected to do it on Usenet in any Usenet forum. It isn't being rude or picky so I would just like you to understand there is no other motive for doing it than that.Morph wrote:I'm not going to dissect all of you post Dave, but will say this. I can't beleive two statments made by you.I am certainly not living in cloud cukoo land but what you say above is IMO the kind of improvement we should have got THIS season. I have yet to say any plausible defence from you or anyone else for us having gone backwards apart from we might do well in the play off's.
What has us not being the force we once were got to do with it? Isn't that part of the problem, not an excuse? At the end of the day it's just a statistic and it isn't that hard to get to a semi final in terms of having to win that many games. How many games is it required to do it? THREE. You don't have to be that consistent a side to get there especially if you get the luck of the draw.Firstly that getting to the semi of cup after, (depsite losing it and I agree, badly) is no achievement. It's not like we have been getting to finals regularly for a number of years is it. And 1 game from a Grand Final in spite of us finishing low down in the top 6. As we are not the force we once were how is that going backwards from the previous season of avoiding relegation?
And guess what? When we did get there we put in one of the dross performances our inconsistent side was typical of in 2007.
That is why I think it masks the underlying problems of the side. If you like, it gives a false sense of well-being. We got to a CC semi so we done good? Not really.
What? You have got to be having me on with that statement, surely!As you have said in the paragraph I've copied above. You would have expected us to have improved this season. I don't really see how that would be a realistic goal.
We can't let one players retirement be the excuse for going backwards. We do need a player like him I agree but the fact remains we have put in some absolutely dire performances this year not due to missing him but just because the players looked unfit, clueless or just not bothered. We make basic mistakes, we give too many penalties away, we drop off tackles, Noble substitutes by the clock, we don't seem to have the mental toughness to win games like v Les Cats at home when we were ahead. There are so many examples of poor play this year that were there in 2007 I do not understand why they have not been worked on.IMO we started this season with a much weaker squad than the year before. We have a weaker pack than last season, the loss of Fletcher to be replaced by Coley, was not a like for like swap. Most fans realised we were a prop short going into the season for us to be really competative. Whether that was Noble's choice, I don't know, but I would suspect salary cap restrictions had a major bareing on it. If we'd had a stronger pack, I'm sure Barrett would have played more like last season and we should have been in a better postion than we are now.
We were only an average side capable of the odd upset last year. We don't seem as capable this year of the odd upset! Noble has had another year under his belt. Nothing has changed. We are worse than last year.FYI, Dave I did watch the games,and held my head in my hands along with many others and admit not to agreeing with all Noble's decisions, if you had bothered to read my previous posts, and maybe its because I have watched the games that I realise that we are only a average side capable of the odd upset. So this is what I base my predictions on for next season, and what I would consider an improvement.
I will even go as far as saying this. If we actually get to the grand final then there is something wrong with the competition structure. A side like ours has no right to be contesting a game to be crowned champions.
He will have had an extended period by the end of 2009. He has already had 2 1/2 seasons and we are where we are which is IMO not good enough. Not when you consider we spend to the full cap limit and have the facilities we have. The club won't sack him but what I was asking you is if we are as bad in 2009 which will be 3 years or poor play, why would you employ him on a new deal?I can see it is going to take time to gets us back winning trophies again, and it won't be a short term fix as a lot of fans think. So you either back the coach to deliver over an extended period, or sack him now and get someone better, if that person exists and they would want to take it.
I think you may have missed a very important point and that is the club has an option at the end of the 2009 season about his contract so must decide if he gets a deal.
If we have another season like this can you imagine what sort of message that would send out to the majority of fans if it extended his deal?
Dave