Page 8 of 11

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 4:24 pm
by Brian Edgar
Fujiman wrote:
josie andrews wrote:
gpartin wrote:Salem witch trials.
??

From what I was told it was an agreement reached between available mods & Mike.
What was the reason though. I didn't agree with a lot that he wrote but still looked forward to reading it. There were times he went OTT but thought he'd calmed down a bit lately. think the mods should issue a statement to clarify
If you use google cache you find the following
Due to repeated deteriorating discussions on the site, the Mods and myself have decided that no other course is available to us than to issue you with a ban.
Can you give me some examples. Seems like one rule for moi and a different set of rules for everybody else. My PMs are even ignored
We have just run out of patience with your attitude towards other users dominating the forum. It has become tedious and it is driving the majority of posters away. The board is becoming quieter and quieter and it can’t go on. So we have taken this action

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 4:45 pm
by Kittwazzer
Brian Edgar wrote:
Fujiman wrote:
josie andrews wrote: ??

From what I was told it was an agreement reached between available mods & Mike.
What was the reason though. I didn't agree with a lot that he wrote but still looked forward to reading it. There were times he went OTT but thought he'd calmed down a bit lately. think the mods should issue a statement to clarify
If you use google cache you find the following
Due to repeated deteriorating discussions on the site, the Mods and myself have decided that no other course is available to us than to issue you with a ban.
Can you give me some examples. Seems like one rule for moi and a different set of rules for everybody else. My PMs are even ignored
We have just run out of patience with your attitude towards other users dominating the forum. It has become tedious and it is driving the majority of posters away. The board is becoming quieter and quieter and it can’t go on. So we have taken this action
Still a bit pointless. All it takes is a different user name!

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:05 pm
by THE 18th Man
i find it funny that the mods have banned sombody for having an opinion different to the mods and agree that other mods should step aside. accusing 1 user of driving people away from a forum were opinions about the club are suppose to be welcomed is just a joke

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:15 pm
by gpartin
send your thoughts to Mike before someone deletes the post or at least copy and paste them somewhere. Good to see another side and would be nice for Mike to see it too.

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:59 pm
by FROM A TO B
This is something the fact that Mike needs to answer (I was not made aware of any bans)

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:24 pm
by gpartin
FROM A TO B wrote:This is something the fact that Mike needs to answer (I was not made aware of any bans)
you should have gone on RLfans mate, Medlocke would have told you.

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:27 pm
by DaveO
TWO EYED WARRIOR wrote:Personally if CP has been banned then certain mod needs to stand aside also
It was Mike, the site owner, who instigated the ban. He asked the opinion of other mods about it first but had come to the conclusion the personal comments in many of CP's posts were driving people away from the site (in a nutshell) as traffic was down. CP was informed by email of this decision when he was banned by Mike but has taken to posing as someone else to get back on the site. Make of that what you will.

I am sure will will see another "new" member arrive soon.

Dave

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:31 pm
by gpartin
DaveO wrote:
TWO EYED WARRIOR wrote:Personally if CP has been banned then certain mod needs to stand aside also
It was Mike, the site owner, who instigated the ban. He asked the opinion of other mods about it first but had come to the conclusion the personal comments in many of CP's posts were driving people away from the site (in a nutshell) as traffic was down. CP was informed by email of this decision when he was banned by Mike but has taken to posing as someone else to get back on the site. Make of that what you will.

I am sure will will see another "new" member arrive soon.

Dave
lets hope so it'll be pretty one sided if everyone who disagrees with some of the tripe you spout gets banned.

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:32 pm
by platt-warrior
You would'nt have an agenda of your own DaveO?

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:34 pm
by gpartin
platt-warrior wrote:You would'nt have an agenda of your own DaveO?
:lol: :o