Page 9 of 11
Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:35 pm
by gpartin
Geoff, the love in bit wasn't aimed at you but the fact you weren't involved either tells its own story. Different people put things across in different ways, its life you mention the number of people who are banned on RLfans yet some of the posters on there are far more nasty pieces of work than any on here yet still remain. Is it really stricter? Anyway this needs sorting because along with those who are willing to speak up in public on here there are others watching who wont say anything just stop posting. I want to know who these great contributors are who have left because of CP and would like to suggest that maybe the fact we're playing well may have made the site a bit quiet, c'est la vie.
Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:37 pm
by pedro
TWO EYED WARRIOR wrote:I'm sure cp is a big boy and would have accepted an email asking him to back off a bit.
yeah if he got 1 maybe

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:37 pm
by DaveO
pedro wrote:
so thats 3 mods noit involved....so its DaveO and Mikes little pow wow? as tyhere arent may more mods are there?
Mike emailed more than just myself. I have no idea who else responded but whoever did or did not the final decision was Mike's and so I suggest you take it up with him.
And that goes for anybody else with their own conspiracy theories.
Dave
Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:39 pm
by gpartin
GeoffN wrote:Anyone mind if I split these posts off onto a separate thread? Not really to do with the Wire game.
yes can you rename it 'bring back CP', for accuracy?

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:40 pm
by gpartin
DaveO wrote:pedro wrote:
so thats 3 mods noit involved....so its DaveO and Mikes little pow wow? as tyhere arent may more mods are there?
Mike emailed more than just myself. I have no idea who else responded but whoever did or did not the final decision was Mike's and so I suggest you take it up with him.
And that goes for anybody else with their own conspiracy theories.
Dave
I'm not suggesting for one second you had nothing to do with it Dave.
Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:40 pm
by pedro
DaveO wrote:pedro wrote:
so thats 3 mods noit involved....so its DaveO and Mikes little pow wow? as tyhere arent may more mods are there?
Mike emailed more than just myself. I have no idea who else responded but whoever did or did not the final decision was Mike's and so I suggest you take it up with him.
And that goes for anybody else with their own conspiracy theories.
Dave
so Mike made the decision and then emailed the mods? differnet to the inital post Dave. if so it may be his site but hes out of order also.
Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:40 pm
by DaveO
pedro wrote:DaveO wrote:gpartin wrote:lets hope so it'll be pretty one sided if everyone who disagrees with some of the tripe you spout gets banned.
Look, it was Mike's idea and you can ask him if you don't believe me. I agreed with it for the reasons Geoff has stated. And plenty of people disagree with the "tripe" I post without resorting to insults or doing so as a wind up for their own amusement (i.e. trolling).
But if you think he got banned because of how he responded to my posts you are wide of the mark.
Dave
so because he disagreed with you he was banned? wow, Dave rename this RLFANS (2)
Can't you read? Read the bold in bold again.
Dave
Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:41 pm
by gpartin
DaveO wrote:pedro wrote:DaveO wrote:
Look, it was Mike's idea and you can ask him if you don't believe me. I agreed with it for the reasons Geoff has stated. And plenty of people disagree with the "tripe" I post without resorting to insults or doing so as a wind up for their own amusement (i.e. trolling). But if you think he got banned because of how he responded to my posts you are wide of the mark.
Dave
so because he disagreed with you he was banned? wow, Dave rename this RLFANS (2)
Can't you read? Read the bold in bold again.
Dave
insult
Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:41 pm
by pedro
Is that an insult Dave...erm Mike?
Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:42 pm
by THE 18th Man
gpartin you have a big point there as last year when we lost the first 3 games of the season there was huge debates about how Noble should be sacked and one of the biggest contributers to those threads was CP. i dont remember any insults he dished out, anyway this year i think we have commented on it a few times that this site has been less active because we have been playing so well and there has been less rows. simples