salford may not be relegated?

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
User avatar
a-true-warrior
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:27 pm

salford may not be relegated?

Post by a-true-warrior »

salford may not be relegated. say that whithaven or halifax go to the GF and win salford will not be relegated accdording to the rfl because halifax's ground is not up to standard halifax will get £100,000 but no prommoation to me it sounds like the rfl are making it up as they go along
RIP mike you will always be remembered

once a wigan fan always a wigan fan
Lazy J
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 4:08 pm

Re: salford may not be relegat...

Post by Lazy J »

This has been the case for the last couple of years, the winners of can take 100,000 rather than go up to super league, halifax have stated they dont want to go up and go full time, whithavens ground is not up to it.
There are 10 types of people, those who get binary and those who dont!
User avatar
jaws1
Posts: 3211
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:43 pm
Contact:

Re: salford may not be relegat...

Post by jaws1 »

a-true-warrior posted:
salford may not be relegated. say that whithaven or halifax go to the GF and win salford will not be relegated accdording to the rfl because halifax's ground is not up to standard halifax will get £100,000 but no prommoation to me it sounds like the rfl are making it up as they go along

Thats correct Whithavens ground is not SL standard and Halifax waived the option for promotion with £100.000 prize .
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: salford may not be rel...

Post by cpwigan »

Back to reality. Surely Cas or Widnes (Hopefully) will be the GF winners making this scenario irrelevant.
DaveO
Posts: 16034
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm

Re: salford may not be rel...

Post by DaveO »

cpwigan posted:
Back to reality. Surely Cas or Widnes (Hopefully) will be the GF winners making this scenario irrelevant.
If by some freakish results they do not, I'd love to see the RFL handle that one.

Salford have already lost players so would they have a right to claim them back (those not out of contract such as Robinson, not Coley whoose contract ended anyway)?

Dave
Antwigan
Posts: 474
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 5:06 pm

Re: salford may not be rel...

Post by Antwigan »

Wood is a tit
Campions of the rugby world.
User avatar
ince warrior
Posts: 791
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 7:19 pm

Re: salford may not be rel...

Post by ince warrior »

Lazy J posted:
This has been the case for the last couple of years, the winners of can take 100,000 rather than go up to super league, halifax have stated they dont want to go up and go full time, whithavens ground is not up to it.
you'd just love to be a halifax fan...
WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGAN!!!

WRLFC & SCFC FOR LIFE!!!

WE HATE LATICS, SAINTS, MACCLESFIELD, BURNLEY, CITY, LEEDS, WIRE AND WREXHAM!!!!
Matthew
Posts: 3273
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 2:40 pm
Contact:

Re: salford may not be rel...

Post by Matthew »

That's putting it politely compared to what I would have called him...
"And Martin Offiah, trying to make some space, now then..." - Ray French, Wembley 1994
------------------------------------------------
Interviewer: So that obviously means that you're not going to St Helens and you're not going to Leeds?

Frano: I don't know why I would ever want to go to St Helens or Leeds
------------------------------------------------
OAMJSONA
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 1:37 pm

Re: salford may not be rel...

Post by OAMJSONA »

Ant

a tit is usefull

Wood is not
Wigan is and always will be a town of Cherry & White

ste lord
Posts: 1128
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 8:12 pm

Re: salford may not be rel...

Post by ste lord »

Come on Fax!!


Keep Wigan "Wigan"




Post Reply