Page 1 of 2
Re: Lee Smith
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:54 pm
by gpartin
JJ wrote:the RFL as charged smith with the kick.
Date 26/09/08
Incident considered Kicking out/strike on face in 10th minute.
Decision Charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Law:15.1(a)/(i) Detail: Kicking out / strike to face. Grade:C
Range of Recommended Sanctions in relation to Charged Grade* NFA-4
Date of Disciplinary Committee 30/09/08
It states that for a NFA-4 it recommends sending off sufficient (SOS)
how will they work this, as he was not sent off.
NFA-4 is a recommended range from no further action to maximum 4 match ban.
Re: Lee Smith
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:24 pm
by Warrior10
Lee Smith been cleared to play on saturday, fined £300. Now on rfl website!!!! Cant believe he's not been banned, although i expected him to get off, always same before big game!
Re: Lee Smith
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:34 pm
by gpartin
Warrior10 wrote:Lee Smith been cleared to play on saturday, fined £300. Now on rfl website!!!! Cant believe he's not been banned, although i expected him to get off, always same before big game!
£300??? ridiculous... he either meant it or didn't
Re: Lee Smith
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:44 pm
by cpwigan
It is the usual. Finals or Internationals and no ban.
Re: Lee Smith
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:53 pm
by gpartin
cpwigan wrote:It is the usual. Finals or Internationals and no ban.
True it would have been easier to take if they had found him not guilty by falling for his pleas. But the fact they have said he is guilty and that kicking someone in the face is obviously not serious enough for a ban is an absolute joke. makes you wonder what a player would have to do to get a ban following a semi.
Re: Lee Smith
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:49 pm
by cpwigan
Hock made the fundamental mistake of touching a referee. Had he broken another players jaw he would have been fine.
Re: Lee Smith
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 5:37 pm
by GeoffN
cpwigan wrote:Hock made the fundamental mistake of touching a referee. Had he broken another players jaw he would have been fine.
He probably will, at some point.
What you no doubt meant to say was:
Had he played for Saints he would have been fine.
Re: Lee Smith
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 1:28 pm
by mike binder
and to make matters worse could be playing for us next season
Re: Lee Smith
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:34 pm
by gpartin
Nobby`s Girl wrote:mike binder wrote:and to make matters worse could be playing for us next season
:eh: Enlighten us?
"Wigan are being linked with a move for Lee Smith – the Leeds winger who scored two tries against them at Headingley on Friday – as they look to replaced Liam Colbon and Mark Calderwood, who have been released."
http://www.wigantoday.net/warriors/Barr ... 4545126.jp
Re: Lee Smith
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:46 pm
by DaveO
Well he made a pretty significant contribution to Leeds victory (MoM) so I wonder if the Saints fans lecturing us over on rlfans about our complaints are happy now?
Dave