Off the ball/late/attack to the face of an opponent/far more likely to lead to several weeks missing owing to broken jaw /cheekbone etc and 1 match with EGP
P.S Not sure how but keep it clean or the thread will be locked for some arbitrary reason
Ben Flower v 2015 standard!
Ben Flower v 2015 standard!
http://www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... t-with-ban
Off the ball/late/attack to the face of an opponent/far more likely to lead to several weeks missing owing to broken jaw /cheekbone etc and 1 match with EGP
P.S Not sure how but keep it clean or the thread will be locked for some arbitrary reason
Off the ball/late/attack to the face of an opponent/far more likely to lead to several weeks missing owing to broken jaw /cheekbone etc and 1 match with EGP
P.S Not sure how but keep it clean or the thread will be locked for some arbitrary reason
-
TrueBlueWarrior
- Posts: 6171
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: Ben Flower v 2015 standard!
Enough said!!cpwigan wrote:http://www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... t-with-ban
Off the ball/late/attack to the face of an opponent/far more likely to lead to several weeks missing owing to broken jaw /cheekbone etc and 1 match with EGP
P.S Not sure how but keep it clean or the thread will be locked for some arbitrary reason
Ps the locking of the last thread was laughable but we all know why!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
-
Wigan_forever1985
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:50 pm
Re: Ben Flower v 2015 standard!
Well actually it is consistent though
if you think of LH punishment for his part in the incident wasnt it 1 match bad and he took BF off the ball with direct contact to head
so in a way that is a consistent ruling
if you think of LH punishment for his part in the incident wasnt it 1 match bad and he took BF off the ball with direct contact to head
so in a way that is a consistent ruling
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
Re: Ben Flower v 2015 standard!
What LH did was far far less punishable than what Green did.Wigan_forever1985 wrote:Well actually it is consistent though
if you think of LH punishment for his part in the incident wasnt it 1 match bad and he took BF off the ball with direct contact to head
so in a way that is a consistent ruling
Re: Ben Flower v 2015 standard!
WGAF now he's back soon and hopefully he's learnt his lesson, even he admits he was completely in the wrong so what don't you understand about the situation. Stop making excuses for him because no one is asking you to
-
TrueBlueWarrior
- Posts: 6171
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: Ben Flower v 2015 standard!
What you don't seem to understand is no one has said what he did wasn't wrong and also nobody has made excuses for the 2nd punch, just that there are mitigating circumstances meaning he wasn't the only one in the wrong!!Kaii wrote:WGAF now he's back soon and hopefully he's learnt his lesson, even he admits he was completely in the wrong so what don't you understand about the situation. Stop making excuses for him because no one is asking you to
No one is asking you to comment on the thread but you do!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
Re: Ben Flower v 2015 standard!
Think you need to re-read this forum because certain people have indeed tried to justify his action to a point that he was in the right to throw the second punch.TrueBlueWarrior wrote:What you don't seem to understand is no one has said what he did wasn't wrong and also nobody has made excuses for the 2nd punch, just that there are mitigating circumstances meaning he wasn't the only one in the wrong!!Kaii wrote:WGAF now he's back soon and hopefully he's learnt his lesson, even he admits he was completely in the wrong so what don't you understand about the situation. Stop making excuses for him because no one is asking you to
No one is asking you to comment on the thread but you do!!
What I don't seem to understand is why you always jump to defend cp, is it a second account or are you his mum?
-
TrueBlueWarrior
- Posts: 6171
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: Ben Flower v 2015 standard!
I think you need to read the forum properly because CP has never tried to justify the second punch only that it wasn't as forceful as some other posters make out!!Kaii wrote:Think you need to re-read this forum because certain people have indeed tried to justify his action to a point that he was in the right to throw the second punch.TrueBlueWarrior wrote:What you don't seem to understand is no one has said what he did wasn't wrong and also nobody has made excuses for the 2nd punch, just that there are mitigating circumstances meaning he wasn't the only one in the wrong!!Kaii wrote:WGAF now he's back soon and hopefully he's learnt his lesson, even he admits he was completely in the wrong so what don't you understand about the situation. Stop making excuses for him because no one is asking you to
No one is asking you to comment on the thread but you do!!
What I don't seem to understand is why you always jump to defend cp, is it a second account or are you his mum?
I am not defending CP and have disagreed with him on many things in the past, but I agree with him on this topic!!
No his Dad actually!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
Re: Ben Flower v 2015 standard!
LoL stop teasing him True Blue
Strewth I have lost count how many times we have disagreed.
Strewth I have lost count how many times we have disagreed.
-
TrueBlueWarrior
- Posts: 6171
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: Ben Flower v 2015 standard!
Exactly!! People see/read what suits there opinion/argument/agenda!!cpwigan wrote:LoL stop teasing him True Blue
Strewth I have lost count how many times we have disagreed.
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett