Joel
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: Joel
shall look forward to the extra penalties he will no doubt bring with him
-
- Posts: 4370
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Joel
For Good Friday or Easter Monday?
I don't like rushing players back, but we cannot afford to have 3 men on the bench again.
I don't like rushing players back, but we cannot afford to have 3 men on the bench again.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
-
- Posts: 4370
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Joel
Agreed,cpwigan wrote:Risky as I presume he could not manage any great length if somebody got injured early in the game. Once fit unless Lockers stays at 6, IMO he starts as a reserve behind Lockers, Farrell and Bateman.
But don't forget, he hasn't had a full pre season again so will not be expected to play well this year.
Same excuse, different year, different players.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: Joel
He did and he was one of the stand-out performers. Having said that it is up to him to force his way into the team and the way the other three are playing that will be very difficult.nathan_rugby wrote:Agreed,cpwigan wrote:Risky as I presume he could not manage any great length if somebody got injured early in the game. Once fit unless Lockers stays at 6, IMO he starts as a reserve behind Lockers, Farrell and Bateman.
But don't forget, he hasn't had a full pre season again so will not be expected to play well this year.
Same excuse, different year, different players.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
-
- Posts: 4370
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Joel
Just read an article on Wigan today which does state he has had a full pre season for the first time in years, so I stand corrected.shaunedwardsfanclub wrote:He did and he was one of the stand-out performers. Having said that it is up to him to force his way into the team and the way the other three are playing that will be very difficult.nathan_rugby wrote:Agreed,cpwigan wrote:Risky as I presume he could not manage any great length if somebody got injured early in the game. Once fit unless Lockers stays at 6, IMO he starts as a reserve behind Lockers, Farrell and Bateman.
But don't forget, he hasn't had a full pre season again so will not be expected to play well this year.
Same excuse, different year, different players.
I do wonder how a full pre-season and then missing 6-8 weeks will impact things? Surely so much time away from rugby and away from fitness training after pre-season will pretty much ruin all of the hard work.
Dread to think what excuses Crosby gets for missing a full pre season and two months.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
-
- Posts: 2092
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:12 am
Re: Joel
So what's your solution? When do they get to play?nathan_rugby wrote:Just read an article on Wigan today which does state he has had a full pre season for the first time in years, so I stand corrected.shaunedwardsfanclub wrote:He did and he was one of the stand-out performers. Having said that it is up to him to force his way into the team and the way the other three are playing that will be very difficult.nathan_rugby wrote: Agreed,
But don't forget, he hasn't had a full pre season again so will not be expected to play well this year.
Same excuse, different year, different players.
I do wonder how a full pre-season and then missing 6-8 weeks will impact things? Surely so much time away from rugby and away from fitness training after pre-season will pretty much ruin all of the hard work.
Dread to think what excuses Crosby gets for missing a full pre season and two months.
-
- Posts: 4370
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Joel
I am confused by what your reply is entailing?So what's your solution? When do they get to play? **
I am just saying Wane seems to always blame a poor pre-season for players not performing throughout the whole season.
**Fixed your quote - Josie

Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."