Karl Pryce
Karl Pryce
Lots of talk about Withers but for me this is the guy we should be going for. Both are out of contract. Only 19, humongous, scores tries a plenty, can play centre/wing, back row. A far far better investment than Withers.
Re: Karl Pryce
Definitely. He was just about the only Bulls player that impressed me on Friday.cpwigan posted:
Lots of talk about Withers but for me this is the guy we should be going for. Both are out of contract. Only 19, humongous, scores tries a plenty, can play centre/wing, back row. A far far better investment than Withers.
Re: Karl Pryce
Exactly Geoff. They improved when he came on. I watched one U21s match last year where he literally played our 21s on his own.
-
- Posts: 4711
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:08 pm
Re: Karl Pryce
ive been thinking about this for a long time now. karl pryce is a machine and he is only 19! has to be a contender for young player of the year. he would add that bit of coverage we are seeking and he is no stranger to the try line. a very good talent IMO, deffinately worth a contract and it would be nice to have that ability to cover certain positions again.
"what ever happens... we stick together... we stay together... we survive."
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
-
- Posts: 3610
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:55 pm
Re: Karl Pryce
But the point is Withers is available and Pryce (presumably) isn't!! You might as well ask for Lyon, McGuire, Horne, Gleeson......
BTW after chatting to a few players it would appear Withers is on his way. Bad move IMO but I assume all the Brown haters (careful with the typing there!) will see this as an improvement to the squad.
BTW after chatting to a few players it would appear Withers is on his way. Bad move IMO but I assume all the Brown haters (careful with the typing there!) will see this as an improvement to the squad.
Re: Karl Pryce
Bad move IMO as well. I really don't see where he fits in...I don't like the idea of moving Ashton to centre, simply because he's done such a good job at FB (and will only get better with experience).jinkin jimmy posted:
But the point is Withers is available and Pryce (presumably) isn't!! You might as well ask for Lyon, McGuire, Horne, Gleeson......
BTW after chatting to a few players it would appear Withers is on his way. Bad move IMO but I assume all the Brown haters (careful with the typing there!) will see this as an improvement to the squad.
-
- Posts: 3610
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:55 pm
Re: Karl Pryce
Certain prominent members of our squad were justifying his possible signing by stating he was just as good playing wing/centre!!GeoffN posted:Bad move IMO as well. I really don't see where he fits in...I don't like the idea of moving Ashton to centre, simply because he's done such a good job at FB (and will only get better with experience).jinkin jimmy posted:
But the point is Withers is available and Pryce (presumably) isn't!! You might as well ask for Lyon, McGuire, Horne, Gleeson......
BTW after chatting to a few players it would appear Withers is on his way. Bad move IMO but I assume all the Brown haters (careful with the typing there!) will see this as an improvement to the squad.

Re: Karl Pryce
Pryce is available. both withers and Pryce have not signed new contracts yet.
-
- Posts: 3610
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:55 pm
Re: Karl Pryce
Sorry CPW I stand corrected. Didn't know he was coming off contract.cpwigan posted:
Pryce is available. both withers and Pryce have not signed new contracts yet.
Re: Karl Pryce
No worrys Jimmy, I wish we would go for him.