Alarmingly Poor

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
User avatar
x-laura-lvz-calderwood-x
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:35 pm

Re: Alarmingly Poor

Post by x-laura-lvz-calderwood-x »

It's a well known fact that Wigan are rubbish at the start of the season then they peak right at the end. It shouldn't be like that but it is. I thought Barrett showed the signs that in months to come he is going to be the superstar and show how its done. I also think Lockers was a load of rubbish. The captain should be best in the team and he's far from it.
'Sexy Mark' On The Shirt.. Get Innn!

'WAG' In ze making!

Staying up, Staying up, Staying up!

And it's Wigan Rugby,
Wigan Rugby FC,
We're by FAR the greatest team,
The world has ever seen =]
Matthew
Posts: 3273
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 2:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Alarmingly Poor

Post by Matthew »

Wigan Watcher posted:
Terrible comes to mind
We lost by 6 points in terrible conditions with a stand off that missed all of warm up matches - in a team that has only just be assembled. The conditions were terrible, the referee unpredictable and we were playing a team that have been tipped for the top 4 - we lost by 6 points and could have stolen a draw at the death. If you want terrible watch some of the games from the start of last season with Millward in charge.
Wigan Watcher posted:
Positives: Hock and Bailey played well and I thought Lockers was solid.
Agree
Wigan Watcher posted:
Negatives: The rest played poorly, the worst being Richards, Barrett did not create, Leuluai
was a big problem for me and I already have doubts over his ability. Fielden was poor along with the rest of the pack bar one. I can go on about everyone but I think I have said my piece.
The half back pairing had never played a match together before - what were you expecting? I think that Leuluai tried too hard. Barrett nearly scored in the first half and seem to show more enthusiasm in one match then Moran did in his entire time here.

Fielden was heavily marked and didn't have a great game - however I thought that young O'Carroll played very well considering his years
Wigan Watcher posted:
O yes and Millard! What are we doing buying him. Out of shape and way too slow.
He took the ball up and once the team get used to his style I think that he and Higham will offer a nice variation.

At the end of the day it is the first game of the season. Last year we lost 10 of the first 12 (I think) - it isn't time to start panicking yet!
"And Martin Offiah, trying to make some space, now then..." - Ray French, Wembley 1994
------------------------------------------------
Interviewer: So that obviously means that you're not going to St Helens and you're not going to Leeds?

Frano: I don't know why I would ever want to go to St Helens or Leeds
------------------------------------------------
User avatar
right cross
Posts: 747
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:57 am

Re: Alarmingly Poor

Post by right cross »

i agree with most of what as been said on this post but we have to remember over the last 3 or 4 years wigan have had 5 coaches all with there own way of doing things .anybody with half rugby brain knows that as been wigans problem .

imo 70% distruption 30% buying the wrong players hasbeens is one of the biggest [little mo]

what do others think [with half a rugby brain ,no affence mind] :D :D
Panchitta Marra
Posts: 6134
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm

Re: Alarmingly Poor

Post by Panchitta Marra »

This team will get better. Barrett, although didnt create much in this match showed he is willing to graft for the team. He got stuck in, dived on loose balls etc, on that strength I dont think he has come over for the ride. He will improve as will Thomas. In my opinion we do have problems in both Richards & Millard. Richards does not know where he is going, cant take a man on and proven poor defence again. Why is he the chosen goal kicker, surely Ashton would have been a better choice as kicker. Millard - OAP status, too slow in mind & body.
User avatar
waterside glens
Posts: 3048
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 7:32 am

Re: Alarmingly Poor

Post by waterside glens »

we will get alot better ,by the time we play at the jjb again we will be ready to tank a few teams.i don't get that some people are saying we where terrible,yes we made alot of silly mistakes but wire are one of the better teams we'll meet and they where lucky to get the points
DaveO
Posts: 15931
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm

Re: Alarmingly Poor

Post by DaveO »

right cross posted:
i agree with most of what as been said on this post but we have to remember over the last 3 or 4 years wigan have had 5 coaches all with there own way of doing things .anybody with half rugby brain knows that as been wigans problem .


I think a bigger problem is not the turnover in coaches but the turnover in players in key positions particularly half back.

People are saying the performance was understandable because the team had not played together much and the half backs not at all as if this makes it all right. Well what a great situation to be in for yet another season. When will the club learn you need a settled side from one season to the next and not operate an annual clear out?

This ideas its almost traditional we have a slow start is no good. Slow starts ultimately cost you position in the league. When was the last time we finished in the top two to get an easier play off run in? Even when we were a good side a slow start ultimately led to us getting to GF's the long way round.

Slow starts are to be avoided and not something dismissed with a shrug of the shoulders. Slow starts show a lack of preparation and too many changes in personnel.

Dave
Cruncher
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:06 pm

Re: Alarmingly Poor

Post by Cruncher »

Glad to see people are cooling off now and starting to see some positives.

That result was unbearably frustrating, but I forced myself to watch the match again later on, and Wigan weren't as bad as I'd thought at the time. All the things that have been said - half-backs not clicking, forwards on the backfoot, three-quarters ineffective - were true, but we still held a superior (on the day) side to two tries and, for all that we lacked a cutting edge, managed to score the same number ourselves.

We know we need another prop, though the young lad did well against big opposition on what was an ideal night for them. The halfbacks need time together, as has been said. For me, the most worrying aspect is the threequarters, Pat Richards especially, whose period of 'nervous readjustment' to playing in SL seems to be dragging on forever. If someone had told me before the game that we'd drop the first ball of the night, I'd have put my mortgage on him being the culprit. The kicking is also a worry. Whether he can actually kick or not, is irrelevant - to me, he seems to lack the temperament for it. His touchliners were so far off, he might as well not have bothered.

So it goes on. We're still paying the price for our poor recruitment policy of the last few years. We're seemingly stuck with Richards and DV for the time being. That's certainly worthy of annoyance, but I don't think it serves any purpose for us to keep mulling over it endlessly and getting angrier and angrier with Whelan and Mo.

There were good things to be taken from Friday night as well as bad. The main thing now is that Noble makes sure the lads' heads don't drop. That's what happened last year, and near-disaster followed.
GeoffN
Posts: 12559
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: Alarmingly Poor

Post by GeoffN »

DaveO posted:
right cross posted:
i agree with most of what as been said on this post but we have to remember over the last 3 or 4 years wigan have had 5 coaches all with there own way of doing things .anybody with half rugby brain knows that as been wigans problem .


I think a bigger problem is not the turnover in coaches but the turnover in players in key positions particularly half back.

People are saying the performance was understandable because the team had not played together much and the half backs not at all as if this makes it all right. Well what a great situation to be in for yet another season. When will the club learn you need a settled side from one season to the next and not operate an annual clear out?

This ideas its almost traditional we have a slow start is no good. Slow starts ultimately cost you position in the league. When was the last time we finished in the top two to get an easier play off run in? Even when we were a good side a slow start ultimately led to us getting to GF's the long way round.

Slow starts are to be avoided and not something dismissed with a shrug of the shoulders. Slow starts show a lack of preparation and too many changes in personnel.

Dave


Maurice makes exactly that point in the match day programme:

"We have spent the last year trying to build some permanency and stability to the club. We now have a settled coaching team headed by Brian Noble and we spent the off-season securing our best young players on long-term contracts. We want to see the team form a familiar look so that new season signings are reduced to a mimimum and even then only players of the highest quality."

Time will tell, of course, whether he means what he says.
Fraggle
Posts: 6020
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 3:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Alarmingly Poor

Post by Fraggle »

GeoffN posted:
Time will tell, of course, whether he means what he says.
There's a first time for everything, I suppose...
http://fraggle.fotopic.net

"You rescue me, you are my faith, my hope, my liberty.
And when there's darkness all around, you shine bright for me, you are a guiding light to me....
You are a Tower of Strength to me" - Wayne Hussey, The Mission.

Shepherd's Bush Empire - 27/Feb/08 - 1/Mar/08
[hr]
User avatar
right cross
Posts: 747
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:57 am

Re: Alarmingly Poor

Post by right cross »

i just hope we don't have to rely on little morris to get us up there. if he was a player relying on performence to get him in the first team ,he would be sub for adlingtons 3rd team :lol: :lol:
Post Reply