Riddell v. McIlorum

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
Forum rules
Post Reply
User avatar
sudokuwarrior
Posts: 501
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 1:38 pm

Re: Riddell v. McIlorum

Post by sudokuwarrior »

absolutely true mick better than piggy
The futures Brett, The future's orange!!!

2007- A fan-tash-tic season!!!!!!!
Top
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Riddell v. McIlorum

Post by cpwigan »

Pig was a shocking signing so Noble and/or Lenny have to carry the can. The best 9 that could be obtained is one called Aaron Payne for the NQ Cowboys. He is never goingh to play Origin due to Cam Smith but he is a brilliant playmaking hooker. Fast, great with the ball. He and McIlorum would be a great combo.

Mcilorum is better than Pig.
Top
ellery 4 coach
Posts: 140
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:13 pm

Re: Riddell v. McIlorum

Post by ellery 4 coach »

Webby1971 wrote:There can be no argument, I'm not 100% sure because the game has only just finished but we must have conceeded 22 out of the 28 points whilst Riddell was on and scored 30 of our 36 points whilst he was off, I rest my case. We obviously scored ALL our points whist Sam was on and ZERO whilst Smith was on. When will it sink in with Nobby??????????????????? Great win lads in the face of such adversity and some shocking decisions.
Top
User avatar
cherrywarrior
Posts: 988
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:03 am

Re: Riddell v. McIlorum

Post by cherrywarrior »

Tonight, defo Mick, not piggy!
Wish list: Billy Slater please!!!!!!!!
Top
TedMac
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 7:56 pm

Re: Riddell v. McIlorum

Post by TedMac »

Michael Mc is quick, never scared to run from dummy half, alert to opportunities, tackles hard and has a real hooker's attitude. Riddell is slow and, basically, pretty boring!
Ted Mac
Top
turf
Posts: 5539
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:53 pm

Re: Riddell v. McIlorum

Post by turf »

TedMac wrote:Michael Mc is quick, never scared to run from dummy half, alert to opportunities, tackles hard and has a real hooker's attitude. Riddell is slow and, basically, pretty boring!
The bit I have hlighted in bold is spot on. Mik, Mcilorum is stronger than he looks as well in my opinion.
Top
User avatar
Wigan_forever1985
Posts: 6673
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:50 pm

Re: Riddell v. McIlorum

Post by Wigan_forever1985 »

what macca has is that tez style cheekyiness too. He ruffles the opposition gets under their skin. He's not maybe got the acolades he deserves what with same and shaun taking the limelight this year
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
Top
User avatar
jaws1
Posts: 3211
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:43 pm
Contact:
Contact jaws1

Re: Riddell v. McIlorum

Post by jaws1 »

Macca by mile.
Top
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Riddell v. McIlorum

Post by cpwigan »

What irritates it that when we got him from Leeds he was in the top 4 of the whole club re fitness/endurance etc. Now he cannot play for the full 80 to the intensity he wants. Roberts seems slower than he did in the NRL. Calderwood criticised Wigan's training. Lee Mossop had to do extras at Huddersfield.

Surely, the conditioning side is letting the club down badly.
Top
over the hill
Posts: 170
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:28 am

Re: Riddell v. McIlorum

Post by over the hill »

just watched the game again and both were on the field for the last 10 mins. was it an injury cos riddell seemed to be playing 2nd row /prop?
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Web Warriors”