2 match ban for Joel!

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
OJ
Posts: 1743
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 8:19 pm

Re: 2 match ban for Joel!

Post by OJ »

Barstewards! I think it is time we started to appeal. Can understand to some extent why they don't especially if that bloke from Huddersfield is still on the panel as he openly admits to hating Wigan. Must be very difficult to get a neutral panel but they could at least make the attempt.
I think it is time all Wigan players gave the Churchilian sign to the RFL regarding international duties, it would not only give them a good rest over winter it would also save them the humiliation of being on another England team to get battered.
Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.











Shaun1967
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:58 pm

Re: 2 match ban for Joel!

Post by Shaun1967 »

Ex Wigan player Colin Clarke usually sits on the panel.
“Usually the fans that abuse players like Sam have never done anything of any note themselves. They’re nobodies, whose greatest claim to fame is abusing someone who has, and these so-called ‘Eddie the Experts’ pretend to their mates that they have."

WALLY LEWIS
DaveO
Posts: 16034
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm

Re: 2 match ban for Joel!

Post by DaveO »

Not looked at the RFL web site but if we pleaded guilty I do not think an appeal is possible.

We need to start to treat the system with the contempt all other clubs seem to do. Pleading not guilty or getting found guilty then appealing does not seem to carry any risk of increased bans.

Every other club seems to do this and get away with it. We should too.
exile in Tiger country
Posts: 2379
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: 2 match ban for Joel!

Post by exile in Tiger country »

DaveO wrote:Not looked at the RFL web site but if we pleaded guilty I do not think an appeal is possible.

We need to start to treat the system with the contempt all other clubs seem to do. Pleading not guilty or getting found guilty then appealing does not seem to carry any risk of increased bans.

Every other club seems to do this and get away with it. We should too.
Nothing on the RFL site currently.
Just the charges/case numbers etc.
I've never seen a woman with hairy ears, and I've been to St Helens." John Bishop

"BANG,CRASH,WALLOP, TRY". E. Hemmings describing Palea'asina's try against KR, Play off 26/09/09
Shaun1967
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:58 pm

Re: 2 match ban for Joel!

Post by Shaun1967 »

DaveO wrote:Not looked at the RFL web site but if we pleaded guilty I do not think an appeal is possible.

We need to start to treat the system with the contempt all other clubs seem to do. Pleading not guilty or getting found guilty then appealing does not seem to carry any risk of increased bans.

Every other club seems to do this and get away with it. We should too.
Look at the farce that happened with Aaron Murphy of Wakefield last month.
He pleaded not guilty - was found guilty - 2 match ban.
Appealed, pleading guilty and was found not guilty and had his ban overturned.

http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?2321

http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?2333
“Usually the fans that abuse players like Sam have never done anything of any note themselves. They’re nobodies, whose greatest claim to fame is abusing someone who has, and these so-called ‘Eddie the Experts’ pretend to their mates that they have."

WALLY LEWIS
OJ
Posts: 1743
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 8:19 pm

Re: 2 match ban for Joel!

Post by OJ »

DaveO wrote:We need to start to treat the system with the contempt all other clubs seem to do. Pleading not guilty or getting found guilty then appealing does not seem to carry any risk of increased bans.

Every other club seems to do this and get away with it. We should too.
Absolutely right - doing the right thing and being gentlemen about it is getting us nowhere. Time for a go at plan B
Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.











josie andrews
Posts: 38439
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: 2 match ban for Joel!

Post by josie andrews »

Shaun1967 wrote:Ex Wigan player Colin Clarke usually sits on the panel.
DISCIPLINARY ROTA 2011

February 2011 – May 2011


Date of Meeting/Appeal Chairman Side Members


Tues 15th March P Charlesworth R Bridge N McAvoy

http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/disciplinary_rota
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
gpartin
Posts: 4706
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:37 pm

Re: 2 match ban for Joel!

Post by gpartin »

What really pi**es me off is that everyone always knew the unwritten rule that you never got a ban if there was a big game coming up. Doesn't apply to us.
Gareth Thomas before his first game: "You wanna spend 10 mins getting smashed up by these guys..Big dudes here.."


josie andrews
Posts: 38439
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: 2 match ban for Joel!

Post by josie andrews »

gpartin wrote:What really pi**es me off is that everyone always knew the unwritten rule that you never got a ban if there was a big game coming up. Doesn't apply to us.
I said exactly that when Lima got banned from MM so he couldn't play in the WCC :(
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
R Douglas
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 12:59 pm

Re: 2 match ban for Joel!

Post by R Douglas »

KOOCH wrote:
josie andrews wrote:
KOOCH wrote:Am I getting forgetful as I get older or not. Did Radford get banned last season for hitting another player whilst the other player was on the ground and splitting his eye open ? Or was that another player that I am thinking about ? Memory seems to be going since I have stopped smoking 40 cigs a day and reducing it to 6 a day. Cigarettes and Cigarettes and Cigarettes are clouding my thought pattern. :D
It was Radford Kooch, but not sure if they/he "appealed" & it was either reduced or just the fine in the end!!!
Thanks for that Josie I thought it was he the cowardly swine. He of exceptional character (my arse)and endearing smile. The double standards abound within Red Hall of whom I have just emailed with my inner most thoughts. :angry:
Kooch,

I'm sat on a hotel balcony in Mexico watching all this play out. Maybe I've had too much Teqilla but I could have wrote the script for the decisions and I'm not even in the UK. Radford hit Bailey on the floor and got sent off. He was then banned for one match with the following quote from the commitee:-

"The panel have taken a great deal of time to come to the decision. You have been given credit for your long unblemished record in the game and the fact that you have pleaded guilty. In our view however this was a serious matter, virtually an assault by punching a player four times to the head who was on the ground, and although your opponent was allowed to continue with the game he did sustain a blood injury." - 7th September 2010.

So what they've quoted in the justification for letting him off this time is a blatant lie. How do they sleep at night?
Post Reply