Six month ban for Flower

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
User avatar
TrueBlueWarrior
Posts: 6171
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm

Re: Six month ban for Flower

Post by TrueBlueWarrior »

medlocke wrote:So do those happy clappers still not think the RFL have it in for us, takes the effing piss, man hit off the ball with a ferocious forearm to the jaw, Ohio will probably get a slap on the hands and told not to do it again, The Fat Wassock and his remedial followers need to be replaced the pack of incompetant Tw@ts :eusa17: :evil:
Come on Meds, Hohaia got 1 game!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Six month ban for Flower

Post by cpwigan »

Stupid stunts like apologising achieved sweet FA
User avatar
Mike
Site Admin
Posts: 7982
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2018 6:54 pm
Contact:

Re: Six month ban for Flower

Post by Mike »

Seems fair enough to me. If you don't want the ban, don't throw the second punch.

Seems comparable to TNs ban, and although the damge done wasn't as great the potential for injury was extreme.

LH's ban is too low, but its due to the media situation. I'd prefer his to have been dealt with correctly, but on the Flower side I think this is reasonable.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
🏆🏆🏆🏆
User avatar
pete&kaz
Posts: 646
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 11:57 pm

Re: Six month ban for Flower

Post by pete&kaz »

I thought he would get approx 10 games. It works out as 10 league games, the WCC match and the friendlies. Probably about right. (Stands back and waits)
adiddy
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 5:26 pm

Re: Six month ban for Flower

Post by adiddy »

A great statement from McManus, talks a lot of sense!!! http://www.saintsrlfc.com/news/page/4398? fixed another one! - DaveO

Matt
adiddy
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 5:26 pm

Re: Six month ban for Flower

Post by adiddy »

Anyone any good at fixing links??

Cheers Matt
User avatar
TrueBlueWarrior
Posts: 6171
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm

Re: Six month ban for Flower

Post by TrueBlueWarrior »

So to simplify this further:-

Hohaia for what he did gets a 1 day ban!!

Flower gets a 6 month ban!!

Yep you are right the RFL don't have it in for us!!

'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
User avatar
Mike
Site Admin
Posts: 7982
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2018 6:54 pm
Contact:

Re: Six month ban for Flower

Post by Mike »

cpwigan wrote:Stupid stunts like apologising achieved sweet FA
Your strategy would be...?

The outcome you expect would be...?

Let me fill that in for you.

Strategy: Argue that Flower was justified and that LHs punishment should be equivalent both in public and at teh RFL.

Outcome: be pilloried in the national press even more, get an even bigger ban. Gain nothing. Lose more.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
🏆🏆🏆🏆
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Six month ban for Flower

Post by cpwigan »

Mike wrote:Seems fair enough to me. If you don't want the ban, don't throw the second punch.

Seems comparable to TNs ban, and although the damge done wasn't as great the potential for injury was extreme.

LH's ban is too low, but its due to the media situation. I'd prefer his to have been dealt with correctly, but on the Flower side I think this is reasonable.
Why Mike? Flower threw 2 punches Neither punch did any serious damage. A week previous a man punched a player 4 times and receive 10 minutes. The world has gone mad!
jobo
Posts: 3851
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 1:33 pm

Re: Six month ban for Flower

Post by jobo »

Think the RFL have once again p&ssed everyone off. The usual suspects are saying he's been let off lightly, whilst 12 games seems harsh.

In the circumstances 8 games would have been more than enough and Hohaia should have got at least 3.
Post Reply