
Bateman at Centre
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:42 am
Bateman at Centre
Brilliant. Reminded me a lot like Dean Bell ,tough,gritty,determined.Got to keep him there,it's something we've really been missing.As I started Brilliant.

- Firestarter
- Posts: 6238
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Bateman at Centre
I've been saying that since saints away last season(emergency centre)
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
- TrueBlueWarrior
- Posts: 6171
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: Bateman at Centre
See my post on the win/lose Leeds thread!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
Re: Bateman at Centre
NO, great in an emergency BUT he is a back rower first and foremost NOT a centre
- Firestarter
- Posts: 6238
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Bateman at Centre
Defo emergency centre cp..I was getting sick of the Joel Tomkins( EC).We never learned from his last spell ,that he can't think,or act,quick enough for a centre.
At the end of the day we didn't play fantastic rugby in attack,but we tackled well.
We still play braindead rugby in our own 25 ,and struggle with the go forward collision.
At the end of the day we didn't play fantastic rugby in attack,but we tackled well.
We still play braindead rugby in our own 25 ,and struggle with the go forward collision.
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
Re: Bateman at Centre
Bateman went great at centre. Now sarg is out its likely he'll stay there. Offers so much going forward in our sets compared to straight backs.
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:42 am
Re: Bateman at Centre
But he's better than any of our so called centres when playing there .Isn't Gelling supposed to be a back rower? Wasn't Sam supposed to be a half back? Batemans best performance by far.cpwigan wrote:NO, great in an emergency BUT he is a back rower first and foremost NOT a centre
Re: Bateman at Centre
Gelling on pre injury form was a far better centre than what Bateman did tonight. He offers far more in the back row probably loose forward when Lockers retires.up the junction wrote:But he's better than any of our so called centres when playing there .Isn't Gelling supposed to be a back rower? Wasn't Sam supposed to be a half back. Batemans best performance by far.cpwigan wrote:NO, great in an emergency BUT he is a back rower first and foremost NOT a centre
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:42 am
Re: Bateman at Centre
No way! To much of a loose cannon ,Bateman tonight was a centre ,not someone pretending to be . As I said earlier something we 've been missing for a long time.cpwigan wrote:Gelling on pre injury form was a far better centre than what Bateman did tonight. He offers far more in the back row probably loose forward when Lockers retires.up the junction wrote:But he's better than any of our so called centres when playing there .Isn't Gelling supposed to be a back rower? Wasn't Sam supposed to be a half back. Batemans best performance by far.cpwigan wrote:NO, great in an emergency BUT he is a back rower first and foremost NOT a centre
Re: Bateman at Centre
No problem. We can now have both Gells and Bateman in the centres and spend our money on a stand off.