Re: Disciplinary?

doc · Post by **doc** » Sun May 29, 2016 11:01 pm

It will be interesting to see the 19 man squad announced for Fridays match at Salford. If any of the three players rumoured to have been involved in the 2 incidents are missing the club will need to put out a statement.

cow yeds · Post by **cow yeds** » Sun May 29, 2016 11:39 pm

thegimble wrote:
Panchitta Marra wrote:On another website it's been mentioned that a player from Wigan supposedly subject of an item being used against him has been seen in a B&Q store with not a mark on him.
The silence of the club again is frustrating.
Sorry but where you work would you like to tell us all when you get a disciplinary. Which should be subject to confidentiality. Club is doing the right thing and has handled it well so far.

The club isn't handling it well, letting all these rumours spread around the country. They should have opened up and said it is being handled internally and the players concerned will be disciplined accordingly.

upandunder1 · Post by **upandunder1** » Mon May 30, 2016 12:06 am

The players stated in the original post, that has been deleted, were involved one of which needed stitches. In a separate incident another 2 Wigan to players where involved in another 'scrap'. Bad week for our great club.

Caboosegg · Post by **Caboosegg** » Mon May 30, 2016 12:16 am

PorterjohLam wrote:
Caboosegg wrote:well incident off the pitch. shouldnt we just fine the guy, force him to do some community coaching and call it there.
IF the rumours are true, it sounds more like a sackable offence, and dare I say had a person in the street done the same, they'd probably be out on remand today.

That's a big if though.

i was making a jibe at the hardaker offence

Post by **Mike** » Mon May 30, 2016 12:36 am

This is a very sensitive subject. To avoid any potential legal issues, please refrain from making specific allegations about specific individuals due to legal issues.

This is just a general reminder and had not been prompted by anything specific.

Thanks.

Panchitta Marra · Post by **Panchitta Marra** » Mon May 30, 2016 12:50 am

thegimble wrote:
Panchitta Marra wrote:On another website it's been mentioned that a player from Wigan supposedly subject of an item being used against him has been seen in a B&Q store with not a mark on him.
The silence of the club again is frustrating.
Sorry but where you work would you like to tell us all when you get a disciplinary. Which should be subject to confidentiality. Club is doing the right thing as d has handled it well so far.

Where I work they would probably make a short statement to stop any incorrect rumour mongering rather than saying nothing.I
I currently have a colleague going through a very similar scenario where a simple statement has been made about his incident. The place where I work is probably subject to more security issues than WWRLFC, yet they are still prepared to issue a statement.
Is this subject of confidentiality, some of the newspapers and radio stations don't seem to agree with you on that.

thegimble · Post by **thegimble** » Mon May 30, 2016 12:57 am

Panchitta Marra wrote:
thegimble wrote:
Panchitta Marra wrote:On another website it's been mentioned that a player from Wigan supposedly subject of an item being used against him has been seen in a B&Q store with not a mark on him.
The silence of the club again is frustrating.
Sorry but where you work would you like to tell us all when you get a disciplinary. Which should be subject to confidentiality. Club is doing the right thing and has handled it well so far.
Where I work they would probably make a short statementt to stop any incorrect rumour mongering rather than saying nothing.
Is this subject of confidentiality, some of the newspapers and radio stations don't seem to agree with you on that.

And have another disciplinary for breaking confidentiality policy

Panchitta Marra · Post by **Panchitta Marra** » Mon May 30, 2016 1:00 am

thegimble wrote:
Panchitta Marra wrote:
thegimble wrote: Sorry but where you work would you like to tell us all when you get a disciplinary. Which should be subject to confidentiality. Club is doing the right thing and has handled it well so far.
Where I work they would probably make a short statementt to stop any incorrect rumour mongering rather than saying nothing.
Is this subject of confidentiality, some of the newspapers and radio stations don't seem to agree with you on that.
And have another disciplinary for breaking confidentiality policy

Who says it's confidential?

Post by **Mike** » Mon May 30, 2016 1:01 am

If something happened what on earth could the club say - "we confirm there was an incident and we are investigating..."

Would that stop rumours or add to them?

However if there wasn't an incident then they could say there wasn't. But then theyd have to every time someone started a semi plausible rumour because of they didn't we'd all assume it was true.

It's a tricky situation communication wise.

Panchitta Marra · Post by **Panchitta Marra** » Mon May 30, 2016 1:05 am

Mike wrote:If something happened what on earth could the club say - "we confirm there was an incident and we are investigating..."

Would that stop rumours or add to them?

However if there wasn't an incident then they could say there wasn't. But then theyd have to every time someone started a semi plausible rumour because of they didn't we'd all assume it was true.

It's a tricky situation communication wise.

The media are doing a job of saying that WWRLFC are currently taking disciplinary action against a club player.
Do the club state this is lies, agree that such action is taking place or just say nothing.