Flower Charged

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
The booze hound
Posts: 817
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 8:05 am

Re: Flower Charged

Post by The booze hound »

cpwigan wrote:
medlocke wrote:Nothing more than an ill timed non malicious tackle made to look worse by SKYs love of the dramatic slow motion shot
It wasn't a tackle
Nor was it malicious. It was more naughty than dirty, in my view of course. 10 minutes on the naughty step would have sufficed.
shaunedwardsfanclub
Posts: 6338
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: Flower Charged

Post by shaunedwardsfanclub »

charging kicks down rarely presents a benefit to the side doing so. I much prefer the Aussies approach were they tackle the kicker, this reduces the risk of giving a penalty away, it stops the kicker chasing his kick and placing his teammates on side and it puts him under pressure. Flowers technique was poor and led to his downfall. Whether it was malicious only Benny will know.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
yonmon
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2016 12:17 pm

Re: Flower Charged

Post by yonmon »

Fair play to the lad Patton he got straight up with no histrionics and that's the way it should be.No one injured in the attempted tackle/block so sending off sufficient.If the lad was seriously hurt then flower should be banned according to the injury sustained. You knew full well that as soon as Eddie and Stevo saw it was flower they would go into full Muppet mode.If Wellens had done the same thing he would have just missed timed the tackle so on with the game but because it's flower then suddenly it's a disgrace.Just because it looked bad on TV does not justify a long ban if there is hardly any physical contact involved IE no injuries. If you start going down the road of banning people for intent then it's a slippery slope.
Wandering Warrior
Posts: 3108
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:09 pm

Re: Flower Charged

Post by Wandering Warrior »

He'll get battered on his past misdemeanours.
Don't know what all the fuss is about? He won us the match on Friday!! :wink:
When John Byrom plays on snow, he doesn't leave any footprints - Jimmy Armfield
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Flower Charged

Post by cpwigan »

shaunedwardsfan​club​ wrote:charging kicks down rarely presents a benefit to the side doing so. I much prefer the Aussies approach were they tackle the kicker, this reduces the risk of giving a penalty away, it stops the kicker chasing his kick and placing his teammates on side and it puts him under pressure. Flowers technique was poor and led to his downfall. Whether it was malicious only Benny will know.
I think charge downs are too high risk but I do think kick pressure is great so bit of a ?
Warrior1872
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 9:34 pm

Flower

Post by Warrior1872 »

2 matches £300 fine
medlocke
Posts: 10917
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:57 am
Location: Millom
Contact:

Re: Flower

Post by medlocke »

Sending off should have been sufficient, although certain people on here with hidden agendas will no doubt make themselves heard for hours upon hours
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Flower

Post by cpwigan »

:musi:
josie andrews
Posts: 38441
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: Flower

Post by josie andrews »

medlocke wrote:Sending off should have been sufficient, although certain people on here with hidden agendans will no doubt make themselves heard for hours upon hours
I agree.
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
joeb
Posts: 315
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 4:49 pm

Re: Flower

Post by joeb »

Bit harsh I think but on a bright side some wanted him hung,drawn,and quarted :o
Post Reply