O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
The flip side I think Wire got things wrong. Sandow earlier? Dwyer on the interchange?
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
Massive error not to play Dwyer.cpwigan wrote:The flip side I think Wire got things wrong. Sandow earlier? Dwyer on the interchange?
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
Wire are a contradiction; so much is right but so much is equally wrong too. If all goes well they will destroy you but make them gring a win and they become brittle, they forget what made them strong and make mistakes under pressure. Wire are the epitomy of why British RL has been chasing the tails of the NRL for 30+ years.
The GF was Wires to lose and they bottled it when they found a XVII in WIgan who had buckets of courage and determination.
The GF was Wires to lose and they bottled it when they found a XVII in WIgan who had buckets of courage and determination.
- TrueBlueWarrior
- Posts: 6171
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
We won!medlocke wrote:Why was it the right decision, he did nothing amazing in attack or defenceTrueBlueWarrior wrote:Was the right decision!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
- Josie's friend
- Posts: 523
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2016 4:54 am
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
We won what counts but that was the worst performance since Flower got sent off at Wire. Neither Lockers or Flower offered anything over our previous performances.medlocke wrote:Why was it the right decision, he did nothing amazing in attack or defenceTrueBlueWarrior wrote:Was the right decision!!
If this is Sean's final appearance as a player then i'm happy he played if not Bretherton & Sharocks shouldn't of been dropped.
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
BORING - You got it wrong re Flower blowing this game he played ok as well as FPN or TT.Josie's friend wrote:We won what counts but that was the worst performance since Flower got sent off at Wire. Neither Lockers or Flower offered anything over our previous performances.medlocke wrote:Why was it the right decision, he did nothing amazing in attack or defenceTrueBlueWarrior wrote:Was the right decision!!
If this is Sean's final appearance as a player then i'm happy he played if not Bretherton & Sharocks shouldn't of been dropped.
Seems you would have been happier if we lost with Flower and SOL than winning.
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
I think JF is correct re the risk but so was Lockers. I disagree though re Flower last night. I thought he was very good.
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
He was the 2nd best prop on the pitch not too far behind Crosby his defence is about the best in SL for a prop. I know Lockers was a gamble but it worked.cpwigan wrote:I think JF is correct re the risk but so was Lockers. I disagree though re Flower last night. I thought he was very good.
Mentioned it twice Shorrocks fault for 2 tries last week with a prop on the diagonal. Hull have decent props but if they could do that what would Simms and especially Hill do.
- Josie's friend
- Posts: 523
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2016 4:54 am
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
That's a bit of a jump there gimble, why would I of been happy since Lockers is by far and away my favourite player. Saying neither of them had an positive impact is my opinion, if you can't handle it then tough.
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
After re-watching the game i have decided to now give Lockers a 6 out of 10 instead, some good steadying play but nothing amazing and certainly nothing world class like some fans are saying