Leeming

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
Charriots Offiah
Posts: 5109
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm

Re: Leeming

Post by Charriots Offiah »

thegimble wrote: Mon Sep 02, 2024 9:16 am Reason for the sin bin was for mounting numbers of pens. Ref himself says it's not contact with the head.

I did not see the game only highlights. So was ref wrong on the number of pens if not sin bin was the correct decision.
It wasn’t even a penalty so there should have been no action, just simply play on. The referee has penalised Wigan twice (penalty and yellow card) for a perfectly good tackle.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm

Re: Leeming

Post by Firestarter »

Im giving them 2 season to stop the nonsence or im done as a paying spectator
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
Suzieb
Posts: 872
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:35 pm

Re: Leeming

Post by Suzieb »

Me to im not paying to watch the referee make a fool of himself thought video ref was to officiate on trys???
eaststandspy
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2021 4:23 pm

Re: Leeming

Post by eaststandspy »

It was never a penalty, and you can't get penalised for the sins of others when you didn't sin. Team warnings should only be for persistent off side, next one to transgress is off.

The play acting (Richie Myler syndrome) needs to be clamped down on, the Catalan cheat went down like he'd been hit by a bus when in fact there was only the slightest legitimate contact thus drawing attention in a desperate bid to get Leeming sent off. The RFL desperately need to address the current trend in too readily sending people off, and instead concentrate on keeping thirteen a side on the pitch. Most of the reds or not serious foul play, so put them on report and let the panel sort it later.

It has just been mentioned by Firestarter that he is considering throwing his hand in, this was also said to me by a saints season ticket holder, he has had enough of the amount of inconsistent yellows, reds & suspensions being dished out. He is considering not renewing next year, because has he put it there are enough players missing through injury without officialdom adding to the problem.
Great grandad Harry ball
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 12:37 am

Re: Leeming

Post by Great grandad Harry ball »

No further action...............unless of course Kendall (and the official unidentified who reported it) have been summonsed for tea and biscuits.
moto748
Posts: 5433
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: Leeming

Post by moto748 »

I still say,

1. Refs are clamping down harder and harder on late, or indeed, any contact on kickers these days. The time when halves had to expect getting splattered every time they kicked away are long gone. This applies in both the the NRL and SL. Everyone knows this, including the players.

2. In the light of that, and considering the score-line at the time, it was a damn-fool thing for Leeming to do. Why give the ref the chance to penalise? So that you can bleat that it's unfair, and the ref got it wrong?
endoman
Posts: 791
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:22 pm

Re: Leeming

Post by endoman »

moto748 wrote: Mon Sep 02, 2024 3:19 pm I still say,

1. Refs are clamping down harder and harder on late, or indeed, any contact on kickers these days. The time when halves had to expect getting splattered every time they kicked away are long gone. This applies in both the the NRL and SL. Everyone knows this, including the players.

2. In the light of that, and considering the score-line at the time, it was a damn-fool thing for Leeming to do. Why give the ref the chance to penalise? So that you can bleat that it's unfair, and the ref got it wrong?
Disagree with point 2, Leeming did nothing wrong.
Taking it further, then we better never tackle anyone so the ref can also not penalise.
Kick pressure is about getting in the eyeline of the kicker etc, he did that well. Ref was just determined to penalise Wigan and sinbin someone.
widdenoldboy
Posts: 2290
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:25 pm

Re: Leeming

Post by widdenoldboy »

Leeming, no further action by the panel (if they even reviewed it?)

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/63 ... view-panel
Wiganer Ted
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:31 pm

Re: Leeming

Post by Wiganer Ted »

Hope the VR feels suitably chastised! Gave totally the wrong info to the ref.

Leeming wasn't late, not high and was not an illegal tackle.
It was not a penalty let alone an offence which warranted a sin binning.
The VR should have told the match ref no offence and re-start with Field playing the ball.


Trouble is fans as old as me have seen this performance from match officials for decades.
Home crowd gets on the refs back. Ref starts to penalise the opposition/away team, eventually sin binning an away team player. The crowd cheers and are immediately off the referees back!
It's almost routine!
moto748
Posts: 5433
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: Leeming

Post by moto748 »

I'm still not entirely clear on who's supposed to have the final word, but it usually seems to me, in most cases, that it's the VR effectively telling the on-field ref what to do.
Post Reply