vs Castleford
Re: vs Castleford
What I can’t understand is playing players out of position. A full back come centre on the wing when there’s wingers available, a second row at Centre and a second row at loose who’s ineffective, reminds me of Lams random picks and that’s not a good thing. Mago looks like he’s been buried in a box underground and fed nothing but water and ryvitas the last few weeks, out of shape badly. I reckon I could make more yards if I’d been buried underground for a month in those conditions! Shame because I was really hoping he would be our pack leader, 18 minutes he played, I’ve held my breath for longer. Thought the young forwards did really well though inc faz n field. Powell his usual ineffective self, another worry is Peet sticking with him week after week of nothingness. Having said all those negatives I’m not throwing in the towel yet, there’s plenty improvement in the side and I think we will do ok this season.
Re: vs Castleford
We need to put field in the halves and cust at hooker when began is fit
-
- Posts: 2785
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:18 pm
Re: vs Castleford
I agree - Field has played 6 in a superb Parra side, he can do the same for us. Cust is an excellent 9. I wonder if Partington could be a ball playing 13 after last night’s efforts. He will never be a front line prop, but his handling is pretty good.
Re: vs Castleford
medlocke wrote: ↑Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:57 pmPathetic that like, really do hop he is gone at the end of the seasonCharriots Offiah wrote: ↑Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:42 pm If the stats are correct then Powell made no metres last night which means he has made one in two games!
Ooo be careful what you say Meds.
You can’t a have a go about Powell’s ability , as you will be judged to be picking at his person.
Re: vs Castleford
I wouldn’t base the assumption he can play 6 on a regular basis on the fact he played 6 games there for Paramatter and was then released?I agree - Field has played 6 in a superb Parra side, he can do the same for us.
He hasn’t played more than 6 games in any of his 4 seasons in the NRL.
He’s already scored more tries (7) and accrued more points (34) from FB than he managed in the NRL over a 3 year period (4 tries / 30 points) in less than half the number appearances (SL 9 vs NRL18).
I think Field has nailed down the FB spot for now and the only way he’ll be dislodged is a loss of form or injury.
How French is slotted in is the dilemma for me.
-
- Posts: 5110
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm
-
- Posts: 4371
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: vs Castleford
Didn’t Mago make 50-60m in his short cameo and had a 9m per carry average?w.thomas wrote: ↑Fri Mar 18, 2022 5:23 pm What I can’t understand is playing players out of position. A full back come centre on the wing when there’s wingers available, a second row at Centre and a second row at loose who’s ineffective, reminds me of Lams random picks and that’s not a good thing. Mago looks like he’s been buried in a box underground and fed nothing but water and ryvitas the last few weeks, out of shape badly. I reckon I could make more yards if I’d been buried underground for a month in those conditions! Shame because I was really hoping he would be our pack leader, 18 minutes he played, I’ve held my breath for longer. Thought the young forwards did really well though inc faz n field. Powell his usual ineffective self, another worry is Peet sticking with him week after week of nothingness. Having said all those negatives I’m not throwing in the towel yet, there’s plenty improvement in the side and I think we will do ok this season.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
Re: vs Castleford
Because cust is an hooker who will quicken us up around the ruck and french is as good as field and in my opinion would work
Re: vs Castleford
These comments are from my husband who has been involved in rugby for 50 years our spine is not right